Berkus (20%), Scorecard (30%), Risk Factor Summation (20%), VC Method (15%), Monte Carlo (15%) · AI Enabled · TRL 7
Valuation Method Breakdown
Final valuation is a stage-weighted composite of five independent methods. Click any method card to expand its visualization.
Berkus Method
20% weight
Scores 5 qualitative dimensions (idea, prototype, team, relationships, traction) up to a max value per dimension. Enhanced with Team Signal scoring.
Scorecard Method
30% weight
Benchmarks against a PPP-adjusted regional median for the stage, then adjusts by 7 weighted factors (team, opportunity, product, competition, marketing, funding, vertical).
Risk Factor Summation
20% weight
Scores 12 risk factors (management, stage, regulation, manufacturing, sales, funding, competition, technology, litigation, international, reputation, exit) on a –2 to +2 scale.
VC Method
15% weight
Projects 5-year revenue, applies a vertical exit multiple (TRL-adjusted), then discounts back by the VC target return for the stage.
Monte Carlo Simulation
15% weight
Runs 2,000 simulations with Gaussian noise around a risk-adjusted base to produce a P10–P90 range.
Composite Weighted Mid-Point
$6.8M
Berkus (20%), Scorecard (30%), Risk Factor Summation (20%), VC Method (15%), Monte Carlo (15%) · AI Enabled · TRL 7
What-If Simulator
Drag the sliders to see how each input shifts the valuation mid-point in real-time.
Simulated Mid-Point
$6.8M
vs. original
No change
10%
0%100%
N/A
N/A$10.0M
N/A
N/A$500K
6 mo
0 mo36 mo
1 people
1 people50 people
TRL 7
Not setTRL 9
Valuation Narrative
The valuation range for Irrefragable, calculated through various methods, underscores the complexity and variability inherent in valuing a pioneering technology company in the AI/ML sector. The methodologies applied include the Berkus and Scorecard approaches, which emphasize qualitative aspects such as team expertise and market potential, making up 50% of the calculations. These frameworks yield results of $2.12M and $3.14M respectively, reflecting a foundational valuation based on the strengths of the team and the innovative nature of the product. Meanwhile, the Risk Factor Summation (20% of the valuation) and VC Method (15%) contributed more optimistic valuations, with the former yielding $2.84M and the latter an exceptional $29.05M, driven by the high potential TAM and market demand for robust valuation tools. Monte Carlo simulations, further enhancing the analytical rigor, provided a median outcome of $3.12M, aligning closely with the key quantitative assessments and resulting in a consolidated valuation range of $2.90M – $6.76M – $10.51M, reflecting varying degrees of risk appetite and investment horizons.
Key value drivers for Irrefragable include its unique positioning as a solution provider for the valuation deficits faced by deep-tech startups, particularly in underserved markets. The automation of startup valuations presents tangible benefits such as reduced subjectivity and increased speed compared to traditional methods, appealing directly to angel investors and smaller syndicates seeking reliable data in this niche. The team boasts considerable technical and entrepreneurial experience, underscoring the operational credibility needed to execute on this vision. Furthermore, the innovative moat created by leveraging synthetic data and community-sourced insights distinguishes Irrefragable from incumbents like Pitchbook, who primarily rely on historical transaction data that may not be well-suited to emerging markets or technological frontiers. This competitive advantage is coupled with a substantial addressable market size estimated at $175M, promising a lucrative opportunity for growth barring effective traction and go-to-market strategies.
Despite these compelling attributes, primary risk factors include insufficient traction, the nascent state of the product, and potential skepticism from investors towards AI-driven valuations. As Irrefragable operates at the earlier MVP stage, the absence of revenue and proven product-market fit may limit initial investment enthusiasm. However, these concerns can be mitigated through strategic partnerships with local angel networks and increasing visibility within investment circles, as well as implementing feedback loops for continuous product enhancement based on early user interactions. Securing a diversified investor base will also be critical to overcome perceived inadequacies in market entry and scalability. The moderate Risk Score of 5/10 further indicates a balanced risk-return profile, allowing for cautious optimism in the company's future.
Given the promising metrics and strategic advantages presented, the investment recommendation is to proceed with a targeted financing of $2.00M at an implied post-money valuation of approximately $5.90M (based on a midpoint of the valuation range), positioning Irrefragable as a credible contender in the automated valuation landscape. This investment will not only underpin the ambitions of scaling operations and enhancing product offerings but will also equip the company to refine its market strategies effectively in a competitive environment.
Estimated Market Size
Concentric circles sized proportionally by market value. Automatically estimated based on vertical, geography, and stage.